Erotic AI, Emotional Risk and the Future of Education: Why the New ChatGPT Update Should Concern Every Educator
- Junior Walker
- Nov 16
- 7 min read
If you work in education, you already know that technology never stands still. Every year brings new tools, new worries and new opportunities to teach in smarter ways. Yet every so often, something arrives that feels different. Something that jolts you. Something that makes you pause, look up from the day to day pressures of marking and planning, and ask what this really means for our students.
OpenAI’s announcement that it will introduce an erotic conversation mode to ChatGPT in December 2025 is one of those moments.
It is a change that carries three major signals. It is a business strategy disguised as personal freedom. It is a new digital environment that could reshape how young people understand intimacy. It is a challenge for teachers and schools that are already stretched thin.
This story is not just about technology. It is about humanity. It is about how we teach boundaries, relationships and safety. It is about how we help children make sense of a world that is moving faster than even the most future focused educator can fully track.
And it starts with a single idea that sounds harmless on the surface.
OpenAI says it wants to treat adults like adults.
But in practice, this update looks much more like a race for engagement, a chase for revenue and a risk to the fragile emotional lives of the young people we teach.
A commercial decision wearing the costume of empowerment
Let us begin with the business story, because that is where this really begins.
In the first half of 2024, OpenAI burned through more than two and a half billion dollars in cash. Investors want growth, and more than anything else they want engagement. They want users who stay, talk and pay.
Erotic chat features are one of the most powerful ways to keep people interacting with AI systems. Elon Musk has demonstrated this with Grok, which charges a significant monthly fee for its adult companion mode. Other platforms like Replika have already used fantasy relationships to create long term emotional connections with users.
OpenAI has chosen to step into the same arena. The message is packaged as adult freedom. The real motive is attention. If you can keep users talking, you can keep them subscribing. If you can keep them subscribing, you can keep the business afloat.
But there is a deeper issue here that educators need to consider. When commercial incentives drive design choices, the impact on young people is often an afterthought. And for teachers working in schools across England, this arrival of erotic AI marks a moment where digital safeguarding will need a fresh, sharper and more proactive response.
Because no matter how much OpenAI promises verification systems and moderation filters, young people find ways around them.
Children always find the cracks in the walls
If you have ever taught a group of eleven year olds, you already know something essential. Children are creative. They are curious. They are persistent. They learn the systems faster than we do. They find loopholes that adults never think about.
Teenagers bypass age restrictions with three simple moves. They borrow identity documents from older friends or siblings. They upload edited selfies that resemble adult faces. They use disposable accounts and VPNs to slip past verification gates.
This is not speculation. It is reality.
Other platforms that already offer erotic AI have seen users break through age checks with ease. Investigations into Grok discovered that explicit content could escalate after minimal prompting. Moderators encountered AI generated sexual abuse. Bots could be switched into suggestive or chaotic modes on command.
When you place erotic conversation features into a mainstream product like ChatGPT, you expand those risks enormously. Schools will feel the ripple effects. Teachers will face new scenarios. Parents will ask questions that are difficult to answer.
And students who already feel lonely or unseen may gravitate toward the emotional warmth of a machine that never sleeps, never argues and never says no.
The emotional trap that young people cannot see coming
One of the most troubling parts of this story has nothing to do with explicit content. It has everything to do with emotional intimacy.
Recent research from Internet Matters found that sixty seven percent of children between nine and seventeen already use AI chatbots. More than a third said it felt like talking to a friend. Among vulnerable children, nearly a quarter used AI for personal advice. Some said they had no one else to talk to.
When you bring erotic features into that environment, you mix three powerful forces. You blend loneliness, curiosity and the illusion of emotional connection. That combination can distort how adolescents understand trust. It can reshape their ideas of consent. It can twist their perception of what a healthy relationship looks like.
As teachers, we see how fragile adolescence can be. We know how easily young people attach themselves to sources of validation. We recognise the signs of isolation long before a child can articulate them.
The arrival of erotic AI companions creates a new layer of risk. These systems do not simply provide content. They provide attention. They provide flattery. They provide fantasy intimacy on demand.
Even if the explicit features are intended for adults only, students will find workarounds. They will share instructions that jailbreak filters. They will use coded language to bypass restrictions. They will teach each other how to trick the model into doing what it is not allowed to do.
This is not an unlikely scenario. It is almost inevitable.
And once the content exists, it can travel anywhere. It can be saved, shared, posted, traded or misused. It can form part of bullying. It can amplify exploitation. It can deepen emotional dependency in ways that are invisible to teachers until something goes wrong.
The regulatory vacuum that leaves everyone exposed
The law has not caught up with AI. Not in the United Kingdom. Not in Europe. Not in the wider world.
In the UK, written erotica is legal regardless of age verification. That creates a loophole that erotic AI can slip through. Content that would be illegal in image or video form may be allowed when it is generated as text. And because AI can generate novel scenarios instantly, there is no clear way to classify what is permitted or prohibited.
Globally, the landscape is even more uneven. Some countries ban erotic content entirely. Others enforce rules inconsistently. The forthcoming EU AI Act may categorise sexual companion bots as high risk but implementation is slow and enforcement unclear.
Meanwhile, companies can change their internal rules at any time. What is restricted today may be allowed tomorrow. What is moderated this month may be relaxed next month.
This regulatory uncertainty affects every educator trying to protect young people. Teachers are asked to teach digital citizenship. They are expected to support emotional development. They are required to safeguard vulnerable pupils. But they are doing this in an environment where the rules around AI are shifting, untested and often incomplete.
Teachers are asked to manage risks that governments have not yet defined, companies have not fully understood and society has not prepared for.
A gendered harm that affects women and girls most
One of the most disturbing threads running through this story is the gendered nature of erotic AI.
Many platforms design their companion avatars as female coded. They are created to be compliant. They are created to be endlessly available. They are created to satisfy male fantasy.
This shapes how boys and young men understand women. It shapes their expectations of relationships. It reinforces narratives that many educators work hard to challenge. And it places girls at greater risk of sexual harm, both online and offline.
Women and girls are already disproportionally targeted by non consensual deepfakes, by unwanted sexual messages and by image based abuse. Erotic AI can make these harms easier, quicker and cheaper to produce.
When these tools become normalised through mainstream systems like ChatGPT, the cultural impact reaches far beyond adult users. It affects how young people learn about desire, boundaries and respect. It influences what they think intimacy should look like. It distorts their sense of what a partner owes them or what they can demand.
For teachers who deliver relationships education, this creates a new set of challenges in the classroom. It adds complexity to conversations about consent. It brings new questions into lessons about respect. And it makes the work of safeguarding teams far more complicated.
So what should educators do now?
Teachers did not ask for this territory. Schools did not sign up to become frontline moderators of AI driven intimacy. But we are here, and the landscape is shifting, and young people need guidance that is clear, confident and compassionate.
Three steps feel essential.
First, we need awareness. Teachers, parents and school leaders must understand what erotic AI is, how it works and why it appeals to young people. We cannot safeguard against a risk we do not recognise.
Second, we need curriculum conversations. Relationships and sex education must evolve. We need to teach students about AI companionship, digital intimacy and the difference between artificial attention and genuine care. We need to build lessons that help young people distinguish between fantasy and respect.
Third, we need advocacy. Educators know the realities of student behaviour better than policymakers. We need to speak clearly about the risks. We need to push for regulation that protects young people. And we need to challenge tech companies that place commercial gain ahead of emotional safety.
This is not a fringe issue. It is a mainstream concern that will shape the next decade of digital life. And if we do not respond now, the consequences will be carried by the children who already feel unheard.
A final thought about AI, humanity and the future of teaching
The arrival of erotic AI in mainstream systems like ChatGPT forces us to ask a bigger question about the role of technology in the emotional lives of young people.
AI will continue to transform education. It will help us teach more effectively. It will reduce workload. It will personalise learning in ways that were once unthinkable. That part of the story is exciting.
But as we move forward, we must remember that teaching is not just about information. It is about guidance. It is about trust. It is about human connection.
Technology will evolve. Tools will change. Platforms will chase profit. But teachers remain the steadying force that young people need most.
In this moment, when AI begins to speak in intimate ways it has never spoken before, our role matters more than ever. To educate. To protect. To anchor. To walk alongside young people as they try to make sense of a world that is advancing fast and demanding even faster understanding.
We cannot control what AI companies do. But we can control how we teach. We can control how we support. We can control how we prepare students for a digital landscape that blends opportunity, risk and responsibility.
And that is where our power lies. In guidance, in empathy and in the belief that even in a world shaped by AI, it is human wisdom that lights the way forward.
Comments